PLOG: (Pinot Log ) 2008  / 2007 / 2006 / 2005

The PLOG is my ongoing journal of wine, life, and the wine life. (I say "ongoing," but beware that it is prone to large gaps of inactivity when fatherhood, bottling, or a new John Irving novel gets in the way.) If you would like to be notified of new postings, you can ask to be "Plogged" when you sign up for the mail list. If you are already on the mail list, simply e-mail me with the words "Plog Me" in the subject line, and I'll make sure you get included in new postings.

12.20.06 | Where Have I Been? Swinging a Hammer and Flying!

Where in the world have I been? That’s the question I keep getting. And I know: it’s been awhile. But I figure I have two more days to get a post up before Christmas, and most likely my last before the new year.
 
I’ve been neck deep in restoration of an old turn-of-the-century officer’s home on the former Naval Base of Mare Island (just a few miles south of Napa). As I just got started writing my annual fall (well, Winter now) snail-mail update, I’ll save more details on the house project for that missive. But, suffice to say that between the wine and the house, I haven’t had much time to plog.
 
But, I wanted to give you two particular updates.
 
For one, the 2006 is coming along nicely. When all was said and done fermenting, the wines had the highest levels of malic acid that I’ve ever seen (probably a product of the timing of the coolness of the vintage); the bracing aciditiy of the initial post-fermentation wine was alarming, but the chemistry told me that the wines would be softening significantly as malolactic fermentation kicked in (turning malic acid—the acid found in green apples—into lactic acid—the acid found in milk). Well, I was right, and the wines are settling in nicely. ML is about 75% complete, and the wines are about 75% of the way to where I want them. ML was bubbling (you can’t see it, but you can hear it) right along until we had a serious cold spell here in Napa about a week ago, and even the caves cooled down a couple of degrees. The “good bugs” that cause ML like it warm. Quite often ML doesn’t complete until the Spring in the caves of burgundy, and we’re only a few weeks behind for Napa. I’m pleased.
 
My second update is that I have been holding some pics that I wanted to share with you all for some time now, so I’m going to go ahead and post them. I had the glorious opportunity to fly in a small plane out of the Napa airport with a friend of mine at the controls the other day. You can kick all the rocks you want on the ground. You can look at all the maps in the world, but you don’t truly get a feel for why vineyards are special until you look at them from the air.
 
Although we took off from the southernmost end of Napa, where the airport and my vineyards are clustered together, we flew all the way north to Mt. St. Helena (pic 1), which is basically rugged, northernmost mountain of the Napa Valley. The view from up there really shows you the transition from the valley to the south to the mountains to the north, with the central valley looming to the east.
 
 
We then turned and followed the Napa river all the way south. I'll put a photo of Opus in there (pic 2), not because I particularly endorse the wines, but because it is a landmark that people seem to know; it's that symmetrical dot in smack dab in the center,with HWY 29 running L to R in the pic. You can see how flat the valley floor really is.
 
 
We also took a detour up to Pritchard Hill (pic 3) to check out some of my favorite cabernet land. It's a prominent hill/mountain on the east side of the valley. That's Chappellet in the middle with the reservoir, I believe, with Lewis just below. Lake Berryessa is off in the distance to the E.
 
 
As we continued south and neared the southernmost mouth of the Napa river and thus the Napa Valley, we passed my old house (pic 4); mine is in that leave-it-to-beaver land just on this side of the school grounds in the center. At the foreground (bottom) of the photo is the beginning of Carneros.
 
 
We then flew over my Stanly Ranch vineyard (pic 5); the part of the vineyard I pull from is  on the slope just to the left of a lone, eagle-inhabited eucalyptus tree in the foregrond; you can see the beginnings of the San Pablo/San Francisco Bay in the background. It's a sprawling vineyard, but I think you can tell from the picture that it has a lot of hills.
 
 
We flew another mile southwest, to the new vineyard, Poseidon's (pic 6) that sits even closer to the water. There's a tree line that goes from left to right, through the center of the pic. That's the old Carneros Creek. The vineyard itself is just above and to the right of that, and if you look closely, you'll see the shadow of a hill smack dab in the center of the pic. My fruit comes from the skirt of that hill.
 
We then flew over the NE corner of San Pablo/San Francisco bay, past the airport, to the Nord Vineyard (pic 6). Again, you can see the bay off to the right. My portion of the vineyard follows the road that cuts along a small rise in the vineyard at the top. This is, overall, a flatter and windier area, with my portion of the vineyard having about 10 feet of elevation and slope.
 
 
We then cut back north, just a mile or so, to get a peek at my Suscol Ridge vineyard (pic 7). The picture shows the obvious slope to the vineyard itself. That entire peak is an old caved-in volcano. In fact, it has much the same soil structure as Pritchard Hill (above), only it's about 12 miles south, in the cooler, Pinot-loving part of the valley. I’ve been told that Suscol and Pritchard Hill used to be the same mountain, cut in half and moved 12 miles apart by a fault line.
 
 
Finally, just a few miles north of Suscol Ridge as we turned back around to land, we saw the beginnings of the Silverado Fire (pic 8). This burned a couple hundred acres before the day was out, and as we headed back ourselves to land at the airport, we could just see the C130 Fire Planes starting to circle in preparation for swooping in and dropping fire retardent. Pretty cool.
 
 
Oh, and I'll throw in one more pic here of Mare Island (pic 9). It's about four miles south of the airport and the vineyards. It's hard to see from the pic, but it is the little spit of land that juts out just behind the bridge in the center. That's the location of our new house (well, very old house being restored) that is taking up all my time.
Cheers, and here's to a fantastic 2007 (and a great ML finish of the 2006's).
 

10.08.06 | To bed, and to bed...

Well, it's done. An, I'm tired. Cousin Bob came up and helped me put the last tank down to barrel this morning. I had the luxury of taking a few shots of the work: 1) an artsy-fartsy pic of a hand filling a barrel, 2) Cousing Bob filling a barrel, and 3) Cousin Bob OVERfilling a barrel...

I can't tell you what a great feeling it is to have all the wine put to bed (down to barrel) and resting peacefully. By this point in harvest, I'm so exhausted, and so is my family, that it's simply wonderful to think of once again being able to get some sleep, excercise, eat better, actually answer phone calls, and get other work done. (Actually, I went from the crush pad down to our never-ending home-restoration project we've got going and ran a jackhammer on some 90 year old concrete for the evening, but I'll save that story for another time). The other winemakers up at the winery (all of whom make other, later-ripening varietals), had that "that must be nice" look on their face as they saw me drive off, harvest finished, this afternoon.

On the other hand, there's always the slight tinge of sadness that yet another harvest has drawn to a close. The whole cycle really started back in March, with bud-break, and it's funny, after all that vigilence and work, to be suddenly free of worry about it all. Sure, the wine will require attention and consideration all the way up to bottling next year, and the wine will develop significantly over the that time. But, the true quality of a vintage has been developed over the last nine months. And, we've removed most of the influence of mother nature now--it's mine, and mine alone, to screw up.

I'll give the three lots (Nord, Poseidon, and "Soup," which is a blend of Suscol/Stanly) another couple weeks to completely finish fermentation in barrel, then see if they have started ML or if they need me to nudge them along.

I think I made great wine this year. And, I think I made great wine in a year when some other not-so-great wines are going to be made. I'm really proud of that. I feel my experience with more-difficult vintages in the past prepared me to make some tough decisions this year, particularly sorting, and those decisions paid off. It has always been sign of a great winemaker to me: someone who can make good wine in tough vintages. This year I got my chance. So far, from what I can tell in barrel, I've upped the level of my craft this year. That's a great feeling.

Every year is challenging and different, but between the rain in the spring, the heat spell in the middle of July, the botrytis, the fire, and the rain at harvest  ... this year was truly different.

Now that the wines are off to bed, so am I...

(Note: the rain lasted two days. No torrential downpour, but a long soak. As I write this, the sun is coming out, and supposedly we've got 10 days of warmth and sun in the forecast. That'll help dry things out.  I don't think there was enough volume of water to cause any irrigation inbalance in the wines. But, it was definitely enough moisture that those thin-skinned grapes that were still out there--perhaps 15% of the fruit?--were indeed turned to soup and rot. If the warmth does come in as expected, the Cab guys should recover and ripen fine. It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.)

 

10.2.06 | Rain, rain, go away...

It's raining. Yup. And all hell has broken loose with crush. I've never heard a phone ring so much as I did Christopher's (winemaker of White Rock, where I rent crush and cave space) this morning. I arrived to the winery at 5am with plans to press off two of my three tanks, and by then Christopher had already gotten quite a few calls. Everyone with Chard, Merlot, Sauvignon Blanc, or (gasp) Pinot Noir still on the vine was calling to get their fruit crushed before the rain makes it a total loss.

We managed to rearrange things a bit in order to accomodate two poor souls who had Sauv Blanc and Pinot Gris that they had to get in.

I talked to some Cab guys up valley. Seems that they are far enough off from ripeness that this rain will pass by, then we have some warmth on the other end, and they'll probably be fine. It's the thin-skinned, ready to be picked fruit that is going to turn into soup, or worse yet, Botrytis soup, with this weather. Driving home last night, I could just see through the rain and darkness that there is quite a bit of Chardonnay still out on the vine in many vineyards. Not good news, in a year where Chardonnay was already in short supply.

If feel for them.

I, on the other hand, had a wet but glorious day at the winery. Pressed off both Poseidons and Stanly/Suscol (fermented together this year). Shoveling tanks is one piece of hard-labor that I don't mind at all. I ran the free run into new tanks, and the press wine into another, and I'm on my way up to the winery today to put to bed (barrel) the free run.

With all these long faces around about the rain, I've had to control my smiles. It looks like we sorted dilligently enough to dodge the botrytis bullet on my wine this year, both tanks went straight to dry (and the third will be there in two days), and the resulting wines are tasting extremely promising. The caps looked extremely healthy as I shoveled them out (a good sign that all is well). I think I've made great wine this year. 

It's still raining.

 10.2.06 | A Morning in the Life...

4:30AM: Although physically still not stirring (after five hours sleep), awake in a mental panic about whether the heater on tank three was set to the correct temperature last night.
 
4:35AM: Remind self that sleep is important, and that I’ve never messed up the temperature on a tank before. Commit to returning to sleep.
 
4:40AM: Fixate on temperature of tank three. Sleep is now out of question, abort staying-in-bed plan, spend five minutes calculating where clothes are as to not disturb wife when arising. Supress three coughs.
 
4:45AM: Arise, grab horribly-unmatching, ratty harvest clothes in dark. Try to weigh less in order to keep the hardwood floorboards from creaking while walking. Check on wife as exiting the room: looks to be a successful, quiet exit.
 
4:50AM: Poke head in son’s room. Muted laugh seeing him with his new dinosaur jammies, legs hanging out through the slats in the crib, and Nemo-fish blanket covering head. He’s snoring.
 
4:52AM: Realize that I’ve forgotten my harvest hat, a critical component to my winemaking for over six years. Remember that it is in room, on bedpost. Quick debate, and superstition wins out.  Accept impending disaster, re-enter room, wife stirs, run quickly downstairs with hat on head.
 
4:50AM: Drive to winery. Nobody on roads. NPR reports rain in forecast in two days. Have moment of sympathetic panic for the Cab guys. Leave VM for best friend Frazier to see if perhaps he wants to help with some barreling down in a few days.
 
5:10AM: Arrive at winery. Still dark. Check temperature gauge and find that all is well. With sigh of relief, wish that I were still in bed now.
 
5:20AM: Assemble pumps, hoses, sump, clamps. Pumpover Poseidon’s for ten minutes. It has gone to dry quite nicely and needs to be pressed off in the next few days. Pumpover Suscol/Stanly for thirty minutes: it is tasting and smelling spicy, and has amazing color. Smile. Pumpover Nord for thirty minutes: it is cold and hasn’t really started yet. This is common to Nord, but that does not relieve my anxiety and frustration. Decided to warm up tank during evening pumpovers, and make mental note to be positive about temperature gauge so that I can sleep tonight.
 
6:00AM: During pumpovers, check e-mail on blackberry and find automated note from city planning commission that my permit for restoring the old house we bought is going to take 6-8 weeks (even though they promised me it’d just be a day). Spend moment pondering how to explain that to the contractor who is supposed to show up with his crew in two days. Decide it is too much to think about in morning, and mentally table until later.
 
7:00AM: Finish pumpovers and clean up. Meet Christopher and other winemakers as they report to the cellar to do their work. Accept comments on being there earlier than usual. Say, simply, “was worried about a temperature gauge.” Watch winemakers nod with understanding.
 
7:30AM: Arrive at home to find wife just finishing her coffee and son just finishing a peanut butter bagel (half of which he’s wearing). Wife is wonderfully sympathetic to my early morning rising, even though I woke her up. Realization that it’s probably a good thing that I caught her after her coffee.
 
7:45AM: Play catch with son with little nerf baseball. He looks to be right handed. Admire his throwing ability (his catching skills leave a little bit to be desired). Watch Baby Einstein with son while mom takes shower and gets ready for work. At one point, Son sticks to me and I realize I’m still wearing my pullover fleece that is covered in grape juice.
 
8:30AM: Wife comes down to take over childcare duties. Picks up son and says, “he’s all sticky.” Point to peanut butter and shrug. Wife takes son upstairs for professional cleaning.
8:45AM: Head to backyard "unabomber" office.
 

09.25.06 | All In...

I slept the sleep of the dead last night, after finally getting the last of the fruit up to the crush pad yesterday. There’s a little lull now where I get to catch up before things get intensely busy with punch downs and pumpovers.

Things went well over the weekend. Saturday was a picture-perfect pick. Had two slaves (the other Kent, and Nicholas-the-pleasant) out there to help sort, but the grapes from Nord Vineyard came in clean, dark, ripe, and perfect. It’s always my “backbone” vineyard. It might not ever be the shining star, but it is always reliable. The night picking they were doing at that vineyard (for Mumm Sparkling) was coming in light and faster than expected, so they had the crew over into my block by 6:30am. We were done by 7:30am with the pick and to the winery and crushed before noon. We were into the cheeseburgers by 1pm. I love days like that.

Sunday was a lot more work. Suscol, which is the shining star, or the dog, depending on the year, was a bit more canine-like this year. We had Don and Jo on the bins sorting, and Greg and Jill out in front picking substandard fruit off the vine. We did more sorting at the crusher, and in the end, I think we put some phenomenal flavor in the tank to work with. But because the fruit got a little roughed up in the process, I’m starting that fermentation a little earlier than usual. No soaking. Better safe than sorry.

Sounds like everyone all over the valley has beautiful fruit, and horrible fruit, on the same vine. It’s just a matter of getting enough hands in there to sort between the two. Actually, in Pinot we had great fruit, and horrible fruit, on the same cluster. I'll attach a pic here. We have this issue where sections of the cluster actually dried up. Complete raisins. On this particular cluster, it was the top section of the cluster. It was easily sorted, but I've never seen it so widespread. What we didn't sort out will give a bit riper/prune character to the finished wine. Not entirely undesireable, in the right quantites.
Would have been an amazing year to make dessert wine.
 
I’ve not had time to call around about smoke damage from the fire, but the few folks I’ve talked to said they think we all got lucky. Apparently the fire burned about 1000 feet elevation above the valley floor vineyards, and the smoke blew it up over the hill where there are no vineyards. By the time the smoke reached Carneros, it was dispersed enough not to cause damage. Or so they say. We’ll see in the fermentor, where it’ll really start to come out.
Off to get some tank samples analyzed to review some chemistry. Poseidon’s started fermenting, albeit slowly, today…

09.22.06 | Gone with the Wind

Crazy day today. Woke up at about 3am because I heard the wind howling outside. It was still howling when I stepped out at 5:30am. Oddly, it was blowing south, which is the exact opposite of the typical Carneros wind. Plus, it was actually a warm wind. I left my hat at home because it wasn’t going to stay on my head.
 
It’s 5:30 now, and I’m looking out my backyard office window at a whole bunch of willow tree limbs on the ground. It’s STILL blowing hard.
 
In between this morning and 5:30, Cousin Karen, the other Kent, a new Trucker named Nicolas and I went out and brought in Stanly Ranch. It was no small feat.
 
The botrytis was, as anticipated, pretty darn bad. We got a crew in there to do a pre-pick of the bad stuff on the vine last night, which was pretty hard on the pocketbook, but pretty darn good for the quality. This morning, Nicolas and I went through and did yet another pre-pick, while Karen and Kent sorted at the bins. We then went through it all yet again at the winery before it went into the crusher. The fruit that made it through the sorting was quite beautiful. I think that is going to sum up the year: those that have the wherewithal to sort carefully will be rewarded with some glorious flavors.
 
There was a fire today, a potentially significant one, in Napa. http://cbs5.com/localwire/localfsnews/bcn/2006/09/22/n/HeadlineNews/NAPA-CONTAINMENT/resources_bcn_html. I saw the smoke at about 8am, and remarked something like, “amazing a cloud can survive in this wind.” Turns out it wasn’t a regular cloud. From what I can find on the web, it didn’t burn down any homes or structures, nor threaten any lives, but I could see the smoke blowing from the area right around Dominus down through the hills west of the HWY 29 corridor and on over to some of the more famous vineyards of Carneros. The fire had helicopters, planes, and fire engines roaring around the valley all day.
 
I haven’t heard reports of damage to the vines yet. Smoke is a tough thing at harvest. Quite a few years back, Carmenet Winery over in Sonoma had a fire. For giggles, we tried to make some wine from the smoke-damaged grapes. It tasted like a glass of ashes from a fireplace. We called it “Burning Leaf,” and we had the Turning Leaf label only with the leaf on fire. (Someone later told me that we got a cease-and-desist nasty-gram from the Gallo legal department; they own Turning Leaf). The stuff was undrinkable. I hope the famed Napa cab vineyards in and around Dominus (Laird, Trefethen…) didn’t get hurt in this not-so-little fire today. The wind didn’t help anyone’s cause.
 
Nord Vineyard tomorrow. I went out and looked at the fruit today. It looks perfecto. Can’t wait for that. Well yes I can. I'd like to get a bit of sleep.

09.20.06 | A Good Start

Other than the small glitch that the Boonfly Cafe—our new caffeine, nourishment and 6am meeting place before picking—didn’t open until 7am (don’t worry, Cousin Bob talked them into letting us in for a cup of coffee and some oatmeal), Poseidon’s Vineyard came in GREAT.
 
Actually, there was another glitch. The truck started leaking radiator fluid a couple days back, and the shop didn’t have it back to me by pick morning. So, I’m sorry to report, the truck didn’t make the first picking day. But, it is back to me now, radiator filled and smiling.
 
We were out there just as the sunlight was beginning to crowd-out the small sliver of moon. When we finally got enough light to see and start picking, it was obvious that the vineyard manager had done a really good job pre-picking the botrytis clusters off the vine. Our sorting at the bins (see pic below, where Cousin Bob’s white shirt is still white) could focus on the smaller stuff. We had a second “Kent” out there as well, and between the three of us, the fruit looked great as it was loaded up and trucked over to the winery.
 
Crush went smooth and easy (nice to start the season with a small, clean pick, and experienced help). I had planned, in anticipation of having to manage botrytis issues, using a more aggressive yeast this year, as well as limiting cold soak and skin contact. But, this fruit looked so good in the fermenter, I dialed the chill jacket down to 50 degrees to cold soak for the next three days, and went and bought my favorite, slow-fermenting, very delicate yeast (AMH) for the occasion. Provided I don’t screw this up, it should be damn good wine.
 
The crazy frenzy to pick right now, coupled with the fact that picking crews are at a premium (yes, our world is one that is significantly impacted by immigration reform), it’s unlikely that I’m going to get a pre-pick of botrytis fruit in the two vineyards that present the most challenge on Friday and Sunday. I’m headed out today to try and complete the pre-pick one by myslef. I’ve got an army of Truckers coming Sunday to help pre-pick the other.

09.19.06 | So it begins...

So It Begins…
 
It’s 5am. I can’t sleep. We start harvest today.
 
I could have slept another hour. No, I couldn’t. I’m too excited, and keep mulling over in my mind whether I have everything prepped. Eventually I decided I’d just get up and do all the stuff that was left to do. Only there is nothing left to do. The pick crews are in place, the bird netting lifted; we’ve prepped the rows, trucks, bins, pick knives. I gave directions to the driver of the flat-bed (alas, the forty-year-old green truck no longer has to haul heavy loads of grapes). The tanks are sparkling and sanitized, so is the pump and the crusher and the destemmer. I’ve got a truck-bed full of bottled water, beer, apples, pistachios, and oreo cookies to tide over the harvest slaves until I can buy them a cheeseburger at lunch.
 
We’re starting a little later in the morning this year. No night picks, as it is too hard to see the botrytis clearly enough to make sure you sort it all out. The vineyard we’re picking today, Poseidon’s Vineyard, seems like it is in good shape. We actually sent a crew in yesterday to review each cluster on the vine and pick off the botrytis-infected clusters, and they actually didn’t have to drop too much. But, there are some horrid reports of botrytis throughout Carneros, as has been expected. Mondavi picked a large chunk of Stanly Ranch yesterday, and by their estimation, they sorted through--and dropped--40% of their crop. That’s a lot of sorting, and a lot of wine that isn’t going to get made. I’ve got the folks in place to make sure we can keep it out of the fermenters.
 
I’m glad we’re starting with Poseidon’s. It’s the easiest pick, as it is small. Good warm up for the other three vineyards which will come in on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. And, I’m all proud of myself that I scheduled all these a couple days ago, thinking everything was ripening nicely. There’s been a mad scramble to schedule picking crews in the last 24 hours. The harvest is going to be super-compressed. Fruit wasn’t ready a week ago, it’ll be soup a week from now. It’s now or never. Suddenly the leaves yellowed, the fruit softened—dimpled even—and the stems have started to brown. Seeds are completely brown. No green flavors at all. This could be a great, albeit a good percentage of the fruit will never even see a fermenter.
 
OK, I’m off. Got to get some ice, fill the truck with gas, and start picking.
Anyone out there that wants to come help sort at 7am on Friday, I could use a couple more worthy souls...
 

09.12.06 | At least a week away...

Spent the whole morning walking and tasting through vineyards. Harvest is still a week off, at least. And, it is going to be a race between botrytis, and brix.
 
The botrytis (noble rot) is, as it was ten days ago, bad in two of my four vineyards. Thing is, even with the foggy, cool mornings we’ve been having over the last two weeks, it doesn’t look like it has gotten any worse, which is a great thing. We had some 90-degree heat, and a good stiff breeze the last two days, and that will further put the breaks on its spread. As previously discussed, the botrytis is coming from the inside out; so there’s not much we can do about it (pulling leaves to allow more airflow isn’t going to dry out the insides of the clusters). It’s depressing to look at these clusters that initially are so beautiful, yet when you look closely, you can see the rot beginning to push out between the berries. It’s like when you feel a pimple forming on your chin on Wed, knowing it is going to be a full-blown zit by your Friday night date and there’s not much you can do about.
 
Assessing ripeness in the vineyard is very tricky this year. Typically, in northern California, we get reduction in acid, then sugar (brix) ripeness, then green flavors go away, then softening of fruit, then seed browning, then stem browning. Well, in the vineyards I just walked, the seeds are wonderfully brown already, but the fruit is firm. The green flavors are all gone, but the stems haven’t browned at all. The fruit is still high acid. And, most importantly, the brix are hovering around 21 degrees, which is a 12.5% alcohol in the finished wine. We need some more sugar production.
 
I actually think we’ve got the makings of more mature-flavored wines at lower alcohols. Always a great thing. Sort of like 2005, in fact. But the mis-match of ripening indicators is confusing. And, we can just hope that we get a few more brix, before the botrytis takes over. Sorting is going to be absolutely critical to quality this year. The fruit that is clean and beautiful is REALLY clean and beautiful. We’re just going to have to sort through the clusters that don’t make the grade. I sent out my annual “harvest slave invite” to those who have expressed interest in helping with crush, and I’m hoping to get a small team out each morning to help sort.
 
I was going to take some botrytis pictures, just to let everyone know what I’m talking about. But, it was early when I headed out, and I forgot my camera. I would include the always-a-crowd-pleaser shot of Owen, but I actually gave him a haircut the other day, and it didn’t turn out so well.
 
I suspect we’ll start picking a week from today if the weather warms up over the weekend as it is supposed to do.

08.28.06 | Harvest is sneaking up on us...

I went out today and confirmed it: harvest is sneaking up on us.
 
But first, let me triumphantly say that I got the 2005 into bottle. It’s a little hard to make an exact description of the wine at this point. After 10 months of settling in barrel, and being starved for oxygen, the act of racking it up to tank, polishing it up, and putting it in bottle tends to make it a little squirrelly until it is able to settle down for another six months before release. But I can tell you without any reservation that this wine is going to be FANTASTIC. The dream harvest of 2005 did indeed deliver. It’s got color, balance, intensity, and a backbone. In fact, the crew of six I got to help with bottling drank almost a case in the two days of bottling; it was tasting that good, even this young (and yes, bottling was THAT fun).
 
We had a little hiccup in bottling. Actually, not so little. I had readied all the capsules, corks, labels, bottles, and had the wine waiting in perfect condition in tank. No easy task to put all these things together. I’d hired a great mobile bottling company out of Paso Robles for the Friday morning bottling. We were going to get it all done in one day. I met the truck at the bottom of the hill at 6:15am, and one look told me we might have problems. They’d brought a different truck than I expected. One a bit longer. 15 feet longer to be exact.
 
Sure enough, it not only couldn’t make the turn onto the crush pad (it’s a tiny facility, where I crush, cave and bottle), but it actually got high-centered on the transition from hill to crush pad. I have to commend the driver, as I thought for sure we’d have to get a crane in there to get the thing out. He managed to free it after about an hour of trying. But, there I was, with corks, capsules, bottles, labels, wine … and no way to put it all together.
 
Luckily, here comes Brad from Le Petite Bottling to the rescue. He’s got the grooviest little trailer that is just one step above manual bottling, but at the same time, is some of the highest quality equipment around. It took us the entire weekend (and the aforementioned case of wine) to complete the bottling, but it is now all safe and sound, awaiting the spring release.
 
Bottling accomplished, the family and I headed up to Yosemite for our annual summer vacation. It’s always my last chance to rest before harvest. Because these types of pics seems to be crowd-pleasers, I’ll include a shot of eighteen-month-old Owen Fortner with his latest toy: a razor scooter. At first it didn’t suit him too well, as it didn’t go fast enough. But then he discovered that he could point it down hill…
 
Yes, I intend to buy him a helmet on my next trip to Target.
 
Like I said, harvest is almost here. The Truckers have started calling, offering to volunteer (thanks, folks). When you walk the vineyard, everything has great color and the grapes are starting to taste like grapes. Harvest for sparkling wines (usually 2-4 weeks before harvest for still wines) has already started, and since I have some blocks that are adjacent to some sparkling fruit, I know that much of my fruit is at 19 Brix (% sugar). We start getting serious about picking sometime around 23-25 Brix, and we gain .75 to 1.5 degrees Brix per week, depending on weather.
 
Speaking of weather, it couldn’t be any better now. We had a pretty serious (and alarming) heat strike in late July. Some of the hottest weather on record. I suspect everyone, no matter where you live, got a taste of it. It worked its way from West to East, sparing few states. As for what that heat strike did to the fruit, the research and experience is limited. But, general opinion is that it couldn’t have been a good thing. Perhaps it did little to no harm, but it certainly didn’t help.
 
But, we’ve now had three weeks now of incredibly perfect ripening weather. 75-80 degrees during the day, and 55 at night. Cool breeze, fog in the morning, and sunshine from about 9:30am on. Seriously, it’s perfect. And, there are no serious heat spikes in the foreseeable forecast, which is great. Hopefully we can have a repeat of the 2005 harvest, complete with a fog-covered pick day.
 
The one remarkable thing about this vintage, which is obvious when you walk the vineyards, is the size of the berries. They are large, and it presents interesting dilemmas for winecrafting. After a wet spring two years ago (when bud fruitfulness is determined), we expected a low-crop year, and the size of the clusters was indeed small. The wet spring this year lead us to believe we’d have more foliage than crop as well. Then we had almost perfect weather during “set” when the flowers turn into berries, and so our small clusters are densely filled with fruit. Then, we had the aforementioned perfect weather during verasion, when the grapes change color. Due to this weather, verasion happened more quickly than I’ve ever seen, and it look as though the berries swelled without restriction, since there was no dehydrating heat to hold it back. So, we’ve got these packed clusters.
 
It is potentially worrisome. Airflow through the interior of the clusters is non-existence, and the wetness of spring means the potential for rot is there. We’ve thinned out the canopies to try and get more airflow around the clusters, but at this point, we have to just wait and see. What’s nice is that ripening is happening so briskly at this point, with the weather so perfect.
 
I’ve been talking to a few fellow Pinot-heads about some strategies during fermentation. Some seem to think that the larger berry size (and thus larger juice to skin ratio), calls for a saignee before fermentation. Saignee (bleeding) of a portion of the juice away from the skins yields two wines: a small-batch rose from the saignee itself, and what is theoretically a darker, more concentrated main wine. However, there are many, like me, who feel that the lack of heat right now is providing us retention in color and flavor, and therefore things won’t be out of whack. No saignee is necessary (less manipulation). We’ll see.
 
I’m off to pick up my new barrels for this year. And, I’ve got a lot of other crush prep to do. This posting, however, has been a good warm-up for harvest. I hope to keep some regular plogging increments during the madness.
 

06.23.06 | Vineyard Review

We’ve reached that time of the season when I just resolve myself to drive a dusty car. I’m going to be in the vineyard that much from now on.
 
Wanted to compare my vineyards side by side, so I visited them sequentially this morning. Also, I consulted with my good friend and excellent viticulturalist Steve Mathiasson. I swear Steve thinks just like a grapevine.
 
We’ve had the wet, wet spring, and now quite a few serious heat strikes in June. The vines are growing like mad with all the sunlight (and water still in the soil). Steve just finished analyzing the latest weather predictions, and it’s looking like we can anticipate a warmer-than-average August and September. That’s not the best scenario, but then again, it is a weather prediction; its accuracy is, by definition, dubious. Regardless, it is what we have to go on, so we’ll adjust viticulture accordingly.
 
Something important to realize when discussing a vintage: next year’s buds, and the fruit that will result from those buds, are out there on the vine right now (dormant, but out there). Their fruitfulness, or sterility, for next year is determined by the sunlight and temperatures we’ve had so far this season. It follows from this that this year’s fruitfulness or sterility was determined last year. And last year we had a wet, uncooperative spring. Thus, we were anticipating a low crop this year.
 
Although for sure it is a lower crop this year—Pinot Noir, overall, seems to be down in the North Coast—a more accurate description would be a variable crop. I’ve seen vineyards with sterile shoots, and those shoots that do have fruit have small, loose clusters. But, I’ve also seen vineyards, like two of my own, with perfectly normal cluster counts, albeit with slightly smaller clusters.
 
Besides looking at fruitfulness and whether the vineyards have been hedged yet (a mower that cuts the way-too-long shoots off at the very top before they grow to shade the rest of the vine), the main decision to be made in the vineyard today is leafing. We pull leaves from the vines for numerous reasons: to open up the canopy for air circulation (preventing botrytis), to expose the fruit to sunlight (just enough), to remove the oldest leaves (which will yellow first and deliver potassium to the fruit when they do), and to keep the leaves from being to densely packed (again, causes yellowing). This year presents a difficult dilemma: we have a high probability of botrytis, but we also have some tender fruit, and not much of it, that will not be able to withstand high temperatures in late season. We’ve got to strike the right balance of opening up the canopy to airflow vs. exposing the clusters to too much sun.
I'll give an overview of each vineyard below. But, this is more for myh notes than for those reading the plog out there. Follow only if you dare...
 
Stanly Ranch: It’s already been hedged, and the canopies look pretty good. We’ve got 80% set on some normal sized clusters, although there seem to be fewer cluster per shoot than average. Some bunching of the shoots, and the fruit, but this is to be expected given the active winds that blow across the entire ranch, pushing the shoots together. Botrytis has not been such a factor here in the past, so we’re going to leaf more aggressively, pulling all the lower leaves and at least 50% of the leaves in the fruit zone. They’ll also try and “unglom” the clusters that are top of one another. Looking good.
 
Suscol Ridge: Should be hedged later this week, ideally before they do leaf thinning, as it is hard to judge canopy balance with the shoots as long as they are. Many more sterile shoots here. Those that do have fruit look to be 70% set on some tiny clusters. Yields will be low on this block. This is a difficult decision. We’ve actually lost this entire vineyard to Botrytis in previous years, which would tell us to leaf like crazy. But then again, the vines sit on a northeast to southwest row orientation, which means that the hot afternoon sun comes right in on the fruit. We need to leave leaves to prevent sunburn. In the end, we’ve agreed to pull the leaves from the underside looking up. We’ll pull the base leaves to expose the cordons and spur positions, to try an get some airlow, but we’ll not touch the leaves that are shading the fruit, as we think we’ll need these. Furthermore, we’ll leave the laterals, as we think we’ll need late-season shading and vigor. The canopies don’t look too dense, so we’ll generally leave the upper canopy alone, with the exception of pulling leaves from the clumps of leaves that might lead to yellowing. Should be finished later this week.
 
Nord: Looking good. 85% set on slightly smaller clusters than last year. This E/W row orientation makes leafing easy, and the proximity of the water (just steps away) keeps things cool down here. No real worry of sunburn. They’ve already done a good job of pulling all the leaves from the fruit zone on the N side of the row. Needs to be hedged, as the shoots are long enough to start drooping, and might get missed by the clippers. Still battling the stunted vines, suffering from salty soils, that are interspersed throughout the west end of the rows. Going to need to simply ignore those vines at harvest time, and not take the fruit. This seems to get worse each year. Otherwise, looking beautiful.
 
Poseidons: This is my first year with this vineyard, so I don’t have much to compare it to. But, fruitfulness (cluster counts) looks great here. 95% set on perhaps slightly small clusters. Issue here is that the wires need to be moved up, and soon. They’ve got the first two catch wires up, but the second is not high enough, and shoots are drooping. It is E/W row orientation, but my rows are tucked on the side of a windy ravine, so I think aggressively leaf pulling is in order, simply as an insurance policy against botrytis, which historically is not an issue here. Also need to get hedged. I’ll have to call Peter and work out a plan to accomplish this in the next 10 days or so.
 
 
06.17.06 | Home Sweet Home
Ah, home sweet home. Where the signs are in English, the World Cup can’t be found on the T.V., and the bomb-sniffing dogs violate you at customs.
 
Seriously, it’s good to be back. We live in a great nation.
 
France was good to me. My learning from this round of Burgundy wines, vineyards, and barrels has given me fantastic new insight. But, I’m also feeling quite jubilant that my experiences over the last five days indicate that I am definitely right on track with my goals for my wine. “Da Truck” showed great as I tasted it alongside both the best, and the bulk, of what is coming out of Burgundy. I think I honed and secured a significant part of the oak flavor profile as well (I say part, because I am hoping in two years to put together a trip to Tokaj, Hungary; I get the other half of my new oak from a forest and cooper in that region).
 
Plus, what fun. If any of you out there are contemplating a trip to the region, let me know. I’m feeling pretty up to date now.
 
Overall, I am overwhelmed this visit by a concept that has been brewing in my mind for some time, but was reinforced every step of the way during my time in France. The French have in an incredible and unparralleled heritage in wine, and they are walking a floss-thin tightrope in regards to preserving and leveraging that heritage, vs. letting it pull them down. From an American point of view, the classification and vinification laws handicap the French ability to make and market better wines. On the flip side, when everything comes together, the incredible cultural depth of the French wine experience is mind-blowing. We Americans approach wine from such a technological and customer-driven point of view. The French approach it from a sense of tradition. But we, the American wine industry, have nothing that even comes close to the rich history of wine in France. Robert Mondavi is current events—and below the fold news—by French standards.
 
And, the “sense of place” in France seems even stronger to me now. It is not just that the wines are about their geographic origin, not their varietal makeup. No, the streets change name every couple of blocks, depending on what neighborhood you are in. The street signs are not even visible much of the time. The exit signs from the highway never provide north, south, east, or west, but rather only the town the exit will take you to (and you are screwed if you are not familiar with that town). The wines, of course, emphasize all this: it is the taste of “terroir”—an overused term, to be certain—that drives the production and marketing of French wines. But, I would argue, it is a sense of terroir that drives everything in France: driving directions and personal identities included. You are simply expected to know where you are at all times.
 
Top ten take-away’s from my time in France:
 
1)      Don’t drive in Paris.
2)      World War II had an impact on France that we Americans may never fully comprehend. We’ve never been “occupied.”
3)      The Burgundian producers who have embraced modern advances in winemaking, and figured out how to incorporate them into their program, are making the best, most interesting wines in the world.
4)      Two croissants for breakfast eliminates any need for lunch.
5)      The Burgundian producers who are hiding behind the vinification and classification laws are making some of the worst wines in the world.
6)      Ambien is the drug of choice for overseas flights. Half of the folks on the flight popped pills and were dead to the world.
7)      Unless I were a winery big enough to have my own forest, sawmill, and cooperage in France (at which point I’d loose my individuality by sheer overproduction), I have to find someone to select and cooper barrels for me, and trust that person.
8)      World Cup is much more enjoyable when watched on European soil.
9)      I need to focus more on the soil structures of my vineyards. I’ve been paying too much attention to the weather, and not enough to the rocks.
10) There’s no place like home.
 
I took a quick tour of my vineyards when I got home. With a current heat wave coming on the heels of this wet spring, the vines are going mad.  I’ve got a lot of work to do.
 
06.16.06 | Bullet and Barrels

“See those logs over there?” Nicolas Tartaret, owner of the sawmill, says to me. His English is quite functional, albeit accent-laden. He is points at a particular stack of thirty-to-forty very large logs laying in the center of the yard. “Those are from up on the border, near Luxembourg. We find, how do you say … from the war … ah, ‘bullets.’ We fine bullets in those sometimes.”

The story behind barrels is every bit as colorful and intricate as I expected it to be.

I think all winemakers would agree that oak (from barrels) has a significant impact on the flavor of high-end wines. To put a number on it, I’d peg it at 40% of the aromatics and mouth-feel on a wine like mine. While obviously a subjective estimation, that gives you an idea of how important it is. And, considering that importance, I find it startling how little collective knowledge there is (my lack of knowledge included) in the winemaking field about cooperage.
 
I met with Nicolas Tartaret, owner of NTBois cooperage, at the cooperage itself this morning. We started early at 6:30am, and toured until 9:30am, at which point I raced to the airport to catch my flight out.
 
I’ll redact my learning from Nicolas below, but beware it will be long (I have 15 hours of flying ahead of me). Many have said they want to read what I have learned, but I suspect not everyone will want to follow here…
 
 
“Forest of origin; that’s all I ever hear from American winemakers,” Nicolas had said to me earlier that same morning, as we ate croissants (damn good), and drank coffee (damn strong) in a conference room on the second floor of his mill. “But, it is just like a vineyard. Sure, you can label a wine from a famous vineyard, but perhaps the grapes are moldy, perhaps the fruit never got ripe, perhaps there is a lot of second crop mixed in. The grapes from the hill are not the same as the grapes form the swale. The harvest varies from year to year. Perhaps it was poorly handled in the winery. It is the same with oak. But yet, American winemakers simply want a particular forest.”
 
Later, as we stand outside and he points to the felled logs from Luxemborg (the bullets, if they are in this batch, are not obvious from the outside), the differences that Nicolas speaks of are obvious. He shows me a single log, just moments after it has been cut to rough length and split, and points out the moss on the bark of one half. “This is the north side of the tree,” he says. “This is a reputable forest, but this particular part of the forest has rich soils, lots of moisture, and is in a swale. The drainage and air circulation are not very good around this particular area.” He turns the split log over, to show me the inner wood. “See the wood here, on this side of the tree it is dark in color. Here,” he hands me the split log, encouraging me to smell the darker wood. I do. It is musty. Not attractive.
 
“Now smell this,” he says, and he hands me the other side of the log, the southern-exposed side, the side with no moss on the bark. The wood is very clean looking, almost pink in color. I smell it. It is pure, beautiful—albeit raw—oak. It actually reminds me a bit of an underlying aromatic in one of the wines I just encountered at Dujac.
 
“And that is from the same tree!” Nicolas says. Point taken. The difference is startling. “And if all you cared about was forest of origin,” he says, “I would make staves from both parts, put them all in your barrel, and charge you lots for that.”
 
There are two schools of thought in cooperage, Nicolas explains: origin, and selection. He is obviously the latter. And, after my time with him, I am too now, particularly knowing that Nicolas is in charge of my selection.
 
A little background and primer on cooperage in France, courtesy of both Paul (from yesterday’s visit to the cooperage), and Nicolas (over croissants). In the pre-war (WWII) day, there was “a cooper in every village.” They would churn out the barrels for the town’s winemakers. Some were larger cooperages with four or five artisans, some were just one man, with the help of a son now and then. The sources of wood were, by necessity from forests near the cooperage itself (transportation was difficult and expensive), Thus the Bordeaux producers pulled from the center and south of France, the Burgundy producers from the center and northeast of the country.
 
Since the two regions were somewhat isolated, regional differences emerged. Barrels from the Bordeaux region developed a long, thinner shape. They also developed thinner staves, perhaps because those thinner staves result in an easier transfer of oxygen through the walls of the barrels, and Bordeaux varietals (Cab, Merlot, etc) benefit from that oxygen exchange, whereas the more delicate Burgundy Pinot Noir and Chardonnay benefited form a slower exchange. This was not something figured out in a lab, via scientific trial, as it would be today. It was a tradition that developed, possibly because a wine made from one particular cooper’s barrels always tasted better, and the “market” pushed every Bordeaux cooper to shift to thinner staves.
 
World War II was a big event for the coopers (as well, of course, for all of France). The wineries were not about to actually make wine at harvest time, knowing it would be quickly confiscated by the Germans. They were also not about to bottle wine for the same reason. So, they simply left their current wines in their current barrels, hidden (mostly) down below in the cellars. No new barrels were needed. And even with the liberation, the market for barrels did not necessarily return; in the early years of reconstruction, few had the disposable income needed for purchasing large quantities of wine, and the Americans, who did, were not yet drinking wine as a society yet.
 
The introduction of stainless steel had a big impact on barrel producers as well, since prior to the use of the stainless steel tank, all parts of the winemaking process used barrels (huge ones for fermentation).
 
As modernization chugged along, the “cooper in every village” turned into a few coopers in every region. When I asked, Paul shook his head “no” at any differences in coopers located in Bordeaux vs. Burgundy, or from the town of Beaune vs. the town of Mercurey. The actual sourcing and milling of the wood has been consolidated, and transportation has made it possible to source wood from all over France, and beyond, no matter where the cooper might be.
 
The forests, being an extremely valuable national resource, are strictly managed by the state. The individual forests are owned by the villages themselves, but the state dictates all management, including when particular trees are to be harvested. When the time comes—and there is no regularity—the state will mark 100 standing trees in a particular section of a particular forest, and the sawmills will be invited to come and bid on the standing trees. This is where Nicolas’s expertise comes in. He estimates the amount of useable stave wood, and its quality, while the tree is still standing. “We estimate ten lots for every one we buy—it is that competitive,” he told me. Actual bidding is done by a top-down auction. The auctioneer starts with a high number and starts counting down. The first person to bid gets the lot. High stress, to be sure. “And when we get the trees back to the sawmill and begin to cut them to length and split them,” Nicolas says to me. “Only then do we know if we’ve purchased correctly.
 
Nicolas and I were not alone as he gave me this overview. He had with him a timber broker from the U.K., a guy named Rupert (perfect name, no?) who was making his monthly visit. Rupert purchased the non-stave quality wood from Nicolas, for use as beams for construction, flooring, furniture, etc. I’ve never met two men who knew more about timber and forests.
 
The state manages the forests carefully, both Rupert and Nicolas agreed. They only allow harvesting on a rate that is sustainable within the particular forest. There was a horrible storm in 1999, where 10% of the forests in France (and ALL the forests in England) got blown down. The state moved quickly, proclaiming that it would not cut trees for three years, and putting all the naturally-felled trees up for bid, so that they would be purchased before they rotted. Prices skyrocketed. “And, you think coopers could accurately supply forest-of-oirgin barrels during this time?” Nicolas asks.
 
Some forests are managed purely for stave-wood from the beginning, and thinning of the forest is done form the start. Others are managed for more profitability, and allow other trees to be grown and harvested periodically for firewood. “Here is where they harvested the firewood,” Nicolas says to me, pointing at the tiny growth rings on a cross cut of one particular log. “See the rings, they grow wider here, as the tree no longer had to compete.” Sure enough, the history of the management of the forest is right there in the growth rings.
 
Today the industry has consolidated. There are approximately 60 total coopers in France, with a couple giant cooperages leading the way, numerous mid-sized below that, and a few tiny operations still holding on. Tonnellier Mercurey, Nicolas’ cooperage, is one of the mid-sized, producing 15,000 barrels per year. Those coopers can buy wood from 100 different mills, but only five of those mills specialize in stave wood. The rest mill wood for furniture, but might do a stave now and then. NT Bois, Nicolas’s sawmill, is one of the five biggest that specializes in stave wood.
 
The fact that Nicolas owns both the sawmill and the cooperage is key to consistency, and this sawmill/cooperage ownership is somewhat unique. NT Bois (Nicolas Tartaret’s sawmill) provides half its wood to Mercurey (Nicolas’ cooperage), the other half he sells to other coopers. To me, it seems a perfect arrangement: dedicated to his own cooperage, while also getting feedback from others.
 
Surprisingly, one of the biggest impacts on demand for barrels in the recent past has been the American wineries and market. I am proud to say that I was witness to the cornerstone of that American demand, as Chalone Vineyard, in Monterey, where I first worked in winemaking, was one of the pioneers in the use of new oak on Chardonnay and Pinot Noir. Dick Graff, founder of Chalone, was the driver behind this, and he even became, for a short time, a representative of a French cooperage, selling barrels to other winemakers here. The wines made in such a way enjoyed a rapid following among the American public.
 
I found it a touchy subject for the French that in this era of the 1970-1980’s, the French winemakers were churning out high quantities of lower and lower quality wines, while it was actually the Americans, emulating the finest houses of Burgundy, who were pursuing quality, including tougher viticulture standards, technology in the winery, and a higher percentages of new oak. Today more than half of cooper’s production is for export, and 80% of that exported is going to the U.S.
 
This is a theory/realization that has evolved during my entire research trip here: it is the strong U.S. demand for fine wine, and the corresponding quest by American (particularly California) producers to make better and better wine (as well as market better and better wine) that now drives much of the world’s wine market. “Scrambling” is a strong term, but for sure the French are now working really hard to keep up. But more on that another time.
 
On the technical side, there is no way I could (or should) go into the level of detail that is reflected in my notes, but I can give some overview. There are three major species of oak that are used for barrels, two of which are found in Europe, one of which is found in America (and subsequently, American oak barrels). In respect to the first two European species, it seems that the differences are, in Nicolas’ words, “not so important.” Not only are the two species very similar, but there is a spectrum of hybrids between the two. To ask for one species or the other would involve a value judgment (or a DNA test) to determine what % of each species a particular tree might be.
 
The main difference between the European and American oak species is twofold: for one, the American version has a much more aggressive flavor profile (and this is obvious in the subsequent wines; wines from American oak have dill, sawdust, and bitter components that, in my—and general—opinion, destroys Pinot Noir but can actually work well with the likes of Zin). Secondly, without going into too much detail, American oak has an extra cell wall allows it to go straight to the saw. Milling of European oak, on the other hand, has to be started with a split along the natural grain. A full explanation would require a blackboard, but basically if the grain of the European oak is not respected, the stave will leak. This makes American oak cheaper, as there is one less step, and much less waste (using 50% of the American tree for stave wood, vs. 20% of a Eurpoean tree for stave wood).
 
Nicolas deftly broke down the quality factors in a barrel for me: physical structure, wood quality, seasoning, toasting and finish. For now, we’ll eliminate structure, because although a cooper might have excelled in the 15th century simply because he made barrels that did not leak, modern times and technology have eliminated that as factor.
 
Regarding wood quality, for sure Nicolas sees different amounts of quality wood in the different forests. But beyond that, as aforementioned, he sees more drastic differences within the forests, and even within the trees. He can buy straight, thick, slow-growing trees with extremely tight grain from well-drained and well-ventilated areas of other forests that are far superior to the trees from the soggy swales of a more famous forest.
 
For sure, however, different forests are better situated in general to produce better quality oak. Nicolas told me three fantastic facts about the most famous and desirable forest for sourcing oak for wine barrels, the Troncais forest. For one, the Troncais forest was originally planted by the king, with special acorns and specific management designed for the glorious purpose of impressing the English with the wood that France would have for the building of warships (never mind that by the time the trees matured, ships would no longer be made of wood). Purely, it was an act of military diplomacy. Secondly, there are definitely good sections of Troncais, and bad sections of Troncais, but the wood is so valuable that it is all used in “Troncais” oak barrels. Finally, there are over three times more barrels that are claimed to be "coopered from Troncais wood" than there is wood harvested from Troncais each year (you do the math).
 
Learning about the seasoning of wood was the most impactful lesson of my trip. Once staves are cut, they are set out to deal with the elements for anywhere from 1-3 years. During this time, harsh tannins are drawn out of the wood as it dries. Obviously, there is a high level of variation between yards located in the warmer, dryer regions, vs. the colder, wetter regions. Also, how you stack the staves for seasoning makes a big difference. Airflow, waterflow, and sunlight exposure are all important. Nicolas told me of one stave mill that actually soaks its staves in a large pool of water for two weeks just after cutting them (although Nicolas had a hard time seeing that as reasonable). The staves at Nicolas’ sawmill were stacked in geometric patterns throughout the yard.
 
I asked him about three-year dried wood vs. two year dried wood. Obviously, there is a price difference. He said most winemakers he’d talked to did not like three year dried wood, as there tended to be too many dried flavors brought to the wine. The parallels to wine are important here, as I think that some Pinot Noir, when left in the barrel too long, tends to taste dried out anyway.
 
Finally, toasting. This is the inexact science—the art, really—of barrel production. Back in the cooperage, Paul had shown me light toast, and medium toast barrels. The visual difference was striking, but even more striking was the aromatic difference. “And, as you can imagine,” Paul told me, “this is an inexact science; it is not merely about how long the barrel is over the fire. Much more depends on the heat of the fire, the shape of the flame, the moisture content of the wood, the moisture content in the air, and ambient temperature (winter vs. summer?). Mercurey toasts only in the morning, with strict regulations on the heat and timing, but in the end, it is a value judgement.
 
Regarding craftsmanship, I would say most all of that is cosmetic. It is indeed a fine craft: the staves of the barrel are bent and held into shape with fire, water, and banging on the hoops. But beyond that, a tremendous amount of effort goes into a barrel that is visually perfect: sanded smooth, the rivets in the proper place on the hoops, the bung hole perfectly lined up with the grain of the heads, etc.
 
The goal in all this, Paul and Nicolas had convinced me, was consistency. To Nicolas, this means that it is better to pull from a broad range of forests and to allow him to select for a consistent style. It means always seasoning using the same geometry of stacks in the same yard for the same amount of time. It means using the same coopers who toast over and over and over to strive for consistency.
 
And all these factors combine in intricate ways. A combination of visiting Dujac and talking to Nicolas revealed that Dujac is actually going for some of the tightest grained barrels around (Nicolas has been doing a special selection just for them), but then they want it just barely toasted, as medium or heavy toast on such tight grain gives a burnt quality. Finally, if one uses light-toast and super-tight-grain barrels, the wine must stay in the barrels for two years before they truly reach a good equilibrium with the beautiful oak flavors. It’s that complicated.
 
Moreover, depending on what style of wine you start with, a barrel can augment, or harm that style. There is no one barrel that is absolutely better, flavor-wise, than others. Think of wine as a soup, and the barrels are your spice rack. A chilled gazpacho soup calls for completely different spices than Chile.
 
This was the beauty of this pilgrimage. To share my wine with Nicolas and Paul, and to get their recommendations on what type of oak and toast to use to achieve my desired result. That, and I have full faith in the origins and integrity of the barrels I am buying.
 
The barrel making process has so many similarities to the winemaking process: terrroir, farming, fermenting, etc. The main difference, however, is that many of the key quality factors in barrels--selection of wood and toast level in particular--are hidden within the barrel, so there is a large amount of trust that must be placed in the cooper. Just as we winemakers do selection throughout the winemaking process--selecting for vineyards, for harvested grapes, for yeasts at fermentation, barrels, and finishing--so too do barrel makers select all along the way. In the end, the person who drinks the bottle judges the selections the winemaker and barrel maker have made.
 
The one regret I have is that we did not have time to get out into the forests itself. Although the Paris airport was only 140 KM (about 90 miles) away, Nicolas said traffic would cause the trip to be perhaps three hours. That didn’t leave us enough time. I bid farewell to him and Rupert, climbed in my little rental car, and headed off. My head was spinning with all the learning from the morning.
 
The good news about not visiting the forest on this trip is that I have a reason to return. Hopefully soon.

06.15.06 | Barrels Full and Empty 

All this week has been building to these last three appointments, and the first two have definitely lived up to their expectations. Today was fantastic. It started with a trip to the cooperage (barrel maker) and then proceeded to the holy grail (according to Kent) of Pinot Noir, Domaine Dujac. It ended here at this great little hotel/restaurant in the countryside just south of the vineyards of Champagne.

 
Actually, the day started with a quick walk into Beaune to get one last croissant from my new favorite spot. I also snagged a pic of the Hospice du Beaune, which seemed like a glaring omission from the travelog aspect of this journal, considering it is the most famous landmark in the city, perhaps in all Burgundy. The tour was worth the 5 euros.
 
I then boogied down the Cote in my little Volkswagon Fox about twenty minutes to the town of Mercurey (I think I might shed a tear tomorrow when I drop this car off at the rental car counter; she’s been that good to me). A quick right at the Faiveley sign (they own vineyards everywhere, it seems), over a small bridge, to the end of the road, and I was in front of the tiny cooperage itself.
 
Here, in the midst of this region’s fabulous medieval architecture, it was funny to find my guide, Paul Attwood, the export director of the cooperage, at his rent-a-trailer office that was next to the cooperage itself. The office was indeed temporary, while Tonnelier Mercurey builds a new office and storage area.
 
Paul was fantastic (and Paul, if you are reading this, I cannot thank you enough for your hospitality). He stuck with me for the next seven hours or so, sort of as a personal tour guide. And, not only was he an incredibly friendly and knowledgeable, but he’s British, so he managed to translate all that has miffed me for the past five days.
 
Before I try to condense and redact my notes from the cooperage tour, let me start by saying that Paul was knowledgeable on not just the cooperage, but on about everything from Burgundy. That’s just what I needed, as my questions have only grown, not diminished, as I get more and more familiar with the area. We not only toured the cooperage, but we also had a wonderful lunch at a restaurant along the road just outside of Mercurey. Over lunch we enjoyed a most intriguing wine, crafted entirely with Tonnellier Mercurey barrels: Domaine Lorenzo “Mercurey, Premier Cru, Champs-Martin.” Paul made the comment that the wine needed a little time to flesh out. I was already pouring my second glass and calculating if I could carry any back on the plane with me.
 
After lunch, Paul had managed to secure an appointment at Domaine Dujac. But en route to the winery in Morey-Saint-Denis, we stopped at a gorgeous outlook over the region of Mercurey (pic at left), and later at the bottom of arguably the most famous white wine vineyard in the world, Montrachet.
 
Paul stopped and "explained" Burgundy form those two spots, and I’ve never had anyone put it so simply. It’s helpful to use a drawing board, or at least one’s hands, to describe all this. (Or, more to the point, it’s helpful to have a view of Burgundy before you when you describe all this). But, I think I can take a shot at it on paper. I loved this explanation.
 
I had known there was a relation between the Dover Cliffs and the limestone of Burgundy, but not the details. Paul painted me a great geological picture. This entire region used to be an ocean, and as such, had a floor of layer upon layer of sedimentary rock (limestone). The water then receded, and the former ocean floor became the bulk of France. There were multiple points—Burgundy, Champagne, and the cliffs of Dover being three—where this huge, flat, sedimentary floor, now above water, “cracked.” The one side pushed upwards relative to the others, and left exposed at the edges were layers of sedimentary rock, particularly limestone, along the seam. This exposed limestone is the cliffs of Dover, the chalky hills of Champage, and the limestone rich hillsides of the Cote of Burgundy (obviously, the hills of Burgundy are more eroded than the sharp cliffs of Dover) 
 
It’s a common saying, started as early as Roman times, that “grapevines love the hills.” Well, it’s not only the hill, but it is a certain part of the hill—just about where the hill is steepest—where vines particularly thrive. Now, take a perfectly pitched hillside, exposed at the perfect angle to the sun, in a region that can just ripen the varietal, and add to that the fact that limestone is poking up at that exact spot on the hill, and … you’ve got Grand Cru.
 
Moreoever, some of the sedimentary deposits are more rich in iron than others. Red wines love the red (iron mixed with limestone), white grapes love the white (more pure limestone). You can see it in the soils as you drive down the road.
 
Simple. And magical.
 
It took us almost an hour from Mercurey to make the drive back up to Dujac. I must say that after all the caves and old buildings I’ve seen over the last four days, Dujac no longer was able to stand out to me. What DID stand out was their newer building (with hints towards ancient architecture) that serves as their fermentation room. Jeremy, the son of the founder of Dujac, and heir apparent, pointed out that most of the domains around Burgundy have to fit modern winemaking techniques and equipment into ancient buildings. Although Dujac’s fermentation room is not a modern, industrial bulding,, it is modified to perfectly suit their technique and style, in particular it has a high enough ceiling to accommodate whole cluster delivery into the fermentation vats. You might have thought, since I'm writing about it, that I would have grabbed a picture of the fermentation room, but I didn't. For some reason I didn't pull out my camera until we hit the cellar (below, right).
 
What also stood out, of course, were the wines. We tasted through some barrels (including some “light toast” trials of Mercurey barrels). We also went through a great little sampling of 2004’s as well, including some premier cru right around the winery in Morey-Saint-Denis, and some Grand Cru whites and reds as well. I won’t go into the detail that I have in my mind, but suffice to say that they were fantastic, and enlightening.
 
I chase after a certain style with Green Truck, and it is represented by Dujac. In fact, it was an encounter with a Domaine Dujac’s Morey-Saint-Denis at a dinner one night about a decade ago that truly put me over the edge when it comes to Pinot. I consider Dujac to have taken the best of Burgundy (heritage, vineyard, wines of balance, etc), and married it with the best of California (modern style, “clean” winemaking, and expression of fruit). It was truly a soul-satisfying experience to sit and taste through their wines in the barrel, and know that my wines back in the caves in Napa have some of the same attributes. I’m not Dujac (and Dujac isn’t me!), but, well, you get the idea…
 
Sure wish I could afford Dujac’s wines when they are released.
 
I then bid Paul a fond farewell. He was off to get home to his wife and three kids (and to arrive in time to catch the England vs. Trinidad and Tobago game). I, on the other hand, climbed in my beloved rental car and headed two hours towards the Champagne region.
 
I did make one stop along the way. I had been listening to the World Cup game on French radio (maddening, when one does not speak the language, to know something is going on, but not being able to identify for whom). I could, however, discern that it was coming up on the second half. Right about that time, I saw signs for Troyes, which I had previously read about: it has some beautiful medieval wooden buildings in its old town center. I think I’ve never felt luckier than when I found my way to the town center, found parking, found a bar in an ancient wood building that didn’t have a right angle in it, and plopped down with a beer and dinner just in time to see England slam a header into the back of the net for the go ahead goal.
 
And now, here I am, in this beautiful little hotel (Aubere de La Scierie, next time you are traveling to the Troyes area?), grabbing a few hours shuteye before I meet tomorrow morning early with Nicolas, the owner of both the cooperage and the sawmill that is 500 steps away outside the hotel. The hotel itself used to be a sawmill as well, although now it is just about the most French-countryside-quaint spot I think I’ve ever seen. I only wish my wife were here; it’s a bit funny (sad?) being here on business, with the other dozen or so rooms filled with couples on romantic holiday.
 
Well, I’m way too beat, and have already written way too much (is anybody still with me?) to start in on the cooperage now.
 
Besides, we’re actually walking the forests tomorrow, and it seems better to start there, and then go to the milling and cooperage, rather than try and work backwards in the plog. Moroever, I’ve got about 14 hours on the plane that I can finish all this up.

06.14.06 | Dig Monks; or Monks Digging 

I think that if you were a monk in Burgundy in the 1500’s in Burgundy, you had two jobs: worship the Lord, and make wine.
 
And not only did they make wine, but they dug out caves where they could store the wine. In fact, they basically excavated—one separate cave at a time—the entire underneath of ever major and semi-major village in the region. Those caves are all in use today by the various producers. I’m not kidding about the existence of an entire subterranean warehouse under the town. It would not take long for an ambitious cellar-owner with a pick-axe to join rooms with his neighbor.
 
One of the things I got to do today was go down in the catacombs below Faiveley. It was a fantastic subterranean journey. Faiveley is one of the larger producers in the area. Not giant, but large. Owned by a succession of six (seven?) generations, they seem to have not only worked through the inheritance laws, but have even added to their holdings. They own the most “monopoles” (slowly piece back together—through purchasing the long-divided shares—the ownership of an entire vineyard in its original property lines, and you have a monopole) of any domaine in Burgundy.
 
As if a case study in the Burgundian classification and naming system, Faiveley makes over 100 different wines. And that doesn’t count the different sizes of each wine (Magnum, half-bottle, etc). It is staggering. I certainly wouldn’t want to be the one keeping their inventory. Hell, as much fun as it might be seeing all those different vineyards develop, I wouldn’t want to have to finish, bottle, and label all those different lots.
 
Yet, in total, it is still not that much wine. When you compare it to a Mondavi or a Beringer back home, well…there’s no comparison.
 
Their caves are everything that caves should be: dusty, dirty, dark, dank, and filled with a myriad of wine from the best vineyards in the Cote d’Or. They even have just one half-barrel of Musigny (a Grand Cru, and a perfect example of these tiny slivers of ownership in some of the most famous Grand Cru vineyards). And not only are their barrels stored down there, but their bottled wine is resting there as well, awaiting sale. But, the cellars are too dusty and humid to store bottles with labels, so they actually go through the effort of bottling without a label, storing the bottles back below in bins, and then they label them just as soon as an order comes through.
 
Interestingly enough, White Rock Vineyards, where I rent my cave space to make Green Truck, is where I first saw this practice of bottle aging in “shiners” in the caves, instead of labeling right away. Then again, White Rock is owned by a French family.
 
Two particularly special things about the Faiveley caves: I got to see the “flood” marks of 1896 and 1910, where the various high-water marks had been registered on the stone walls. Secondly, in the “early days,” they didn’t have fork lifts that could help them bring the bins of bottled-but-unlabeled wine up to the surface for labeling. So, in an attempt to save the backs of their cellar workers, they brought in a chain, track, pulley, and four-bottle-at-a-time overhead rack system that ran sort of like a toy train set through the entire cave and up to the surface. This was actually a modification of a system used on the Maginot line to move ammunition form the bunkers to the guys up top pulling the triggers. You can just picture some hard-working French cellar rats putting four bottles at a time in the system.
 
We didn’t taste all 100 wines, thank goodness. But, we did taste a good flight of reds, in particular some from 1993 and 1998. They were chunky, tannic, and massive: very “Burgundian” (earthy). Sucked all the moisture right out of you. We tasted two whites also, and I was particularly fond of the Chassagne Montrachet 2004, which reminded me of the wines I helped make back at Chalone in the late 1990’s (more appropriately, I should say the Chalone white wines reminded me of Faiveley, considering which truly came first).
 
When I finally shared Green Truck with them, I think they were most intrigued and impressed by the smoothness and delicacy of my wine. I was honored. “Most Pinot Noir I taste from California does not taste like Pinot Noir,” said Christophe, the export director who came down when he heard that I had a bottle open. “This I can identify as Pinot Noir.”
 
From a cornerstone of Burgundy, (from UNDER a cornerstone of Burgundy) I’ll take that as a compliment.
 
We talked for quite awhile about the “system” in France: it’s limitations and benefits. I was not aware that the decision as to when to start picking is actually retained by the village itself. Thus, if you think the grapes are ready, but the village hasn’t given everyone the “go,” you have to wait. That decision of when to pick—one of the most crucial decisions in winemaking—is basically dictated by the government. 
 
The spacing and height of the vines in Burgundy, a mere meter by meter, and no more than knee-high off the ground as well, has always baffled me too. I was not aware that the height of the vines was actually dictated by the AOC (appellation control). After a bit of discussion, I finally got it out of them that if they would, if they could, train the vines higher, as we do typically in the U.S. It would make the picker’s job a million times easier, and elevates the fruit zone from the diseases and rodents. But the original “Guyot” system is in place, and held there by law.
 
Ah, to have to make wine in old caves, with old rules, and ancient vineyards. So different from what I know.
 
Tomorrow I head to the cooperage. I can’t wait. I think I’ve worked through my jetlag such that I won’t fall asleep over the toasting fire. I’m also headed to Domaine Dujac, my absolute favorite producer in the world, that afternoon. Then, at the end of the day, if all goes as planned, I should arrive in Troyes, in the Champagne region, where the stave mill and forest are awaiting for a stroll the next morning. Then it’s back to the airport. Can’t believe we’re sneaking up on my return.
 
Come to think of it, I better take the last few minutes I have on the day and go find a gift for my wife.
 

06.13.06 | I Stood in Romanee-Conti Today 

I stood in Romanee Conti today. I also stood amongst some screaming French soccer fans. The two experiences could not have been more different.
 
Not to insult those who might not be familiar with the Romanee Conti vineyard, but it is considered the most famous and celebrated vineyard (and subsequent wine) in the world. If you have not heard of it, it is most likely because you also do not own a yacht, a jet, or an 80-acre country estate in Jackson Hole, WY. That is the price point.
 
When I sat down to watch France and Switzerland play to a draw in the World Cup on TV, I was surrounded by Frenchmen drinking beer. Cheap beer at that.
 
I arrived at Romanee Conti, and the contiguous Grand Cru vineyards in the Vosne-Romanee appellation, right about as the sun was setting. I had the entire place to myself. There it was, the most important dirt in the wine world. No more than a knee-high rock fence separating me from the short, tightly-packed vines (what, no security guard?). The rest of the Cote d’Or spread before me in a clear, silent, beautiful evening.
 
During the soccer match, even when the heads of screaming Frenchmen briefly parted to reveal the large-screen T.V. at the bar’s end, the room was so filled with cigarette smoke that the game was hazy, at best.
 
I’m struck particularly by what might be the only similarity between the two experiences: as I drove up to the Romanee-Conti vineyard, I passed two children kicking a soccer ball back and forth over the 16th century cobblestone roads.
 
The kids hardly bothered to glance at me in my rented Volkswagon, bouncing up the vineyard road to the hallowed ground. How special it seems to me for kids to actually grow up just below that spot, with all of its history (and historical vineyards). But to them, it was probably just home, and—between the slopes of the area and the cobblestones—not a very good home for kicking a soccer-ball around at that.
 
I can only assume that the children are used to strange folks driving up the hill to the vineyard at random hours. When you reach the intersection of the two dirt roads where the small (4 acre) plot begins, there, next to the etched stone marker for the vineyard itself, is a sign. I took a picture of it.
 
"Thank you for your comprehension," is the sign's salutation. Comprehension? Here, in this four acres, is the holy grail of Pinot Noir. But turn to your left, walk across the narrow dirt road, and you enter a plot with the exact same slope and the exact same grape planted, yet La Grand Rue vineyard creates entirely uninspiring wine. Walk yet another forty paces through La Grand Rue, and you enter the vineyard of La Tache; you are now back up in the stratosphere of fame and fortune. What makes particular tiny plots of land so special while contiguous others languish in obscurity and mediocrity? It is that exact question which makes Pinot Noir so wonderful.
 
All of this—Romanee Conti, the other Grand Cru Vineyards, the soccer match—is located in and around the central town of Beaune. Anyone traveling to Burgundy will inevitably find their way to this fantastic town. And, if you are coming this way, I would urge you to stay here. It is wonderful. In many ways, the town is similar to its contemporaries in Italy, the likes of Sienna and San Gimignano. Ok, not that medieval, but it’s got that wonderful old stone architecture. The town is a circle, and perhaps only a mile or so across. If you get turned around as you walk the narrow cobblestone streets, you simply have to keep heading in one direction, which dumps you on the outer road, where you simply walk around until you once again recognize an entrance. Two or three times of doing that, and you’ve walked the entire town (I know this from experience).
 
I actually did not arrive in Beaune until mid-afternoon. The three-hour drive down turned into four hours when I had a little trouble, once again, navigating the labyrinth that is Paris. The four-hour trip then turned into a five-hour trip when I had to stop, recline my seat, and take a nap.
 
My time clock is still rather whacked.
 
 
06.12.06 | The Phantom of the Opera 
The USA just got their hat handed to them by the Czech Republic. There. That’s all I want to say about that.
 
I’d not given much thought about how hot and muggy Paris would be this time of year. After a soft landing, a smooth run through customs, and feeling violated by the exchange rate at the American Express counter, I hopped in my tiny, rented Volkswagon Fox and drove into Paris.
 
Mind you that Paris was built long before “city planning” became a subject in which one could major in at university. The layout of the city has no resemblance to the grids that we Americans have come to know and love. The street names are not on signposts, but rather hidden up against the buildings, if there are street signs at all. Add to this that none of the businesses seem inclined to put their street number on their storefronts, as well as some traffic that would give road-rage to a New York cabbie—the scooter-riding Parisiens have a death wish—and it can be quite an experience navigating a car to a hotel. In the end, I just got lucky and found and followed the signs to “The Opera” which I’d seen on the map was near the Hotel Antin Trinite, my resting place for the night.
 
When I say “The Opera,” I mean THE Opera, the one that was made famous in the Phantom of the Opera. It’s about two blocks away. I took a very uninspiring picture of it, which I’ll throw in here.
 
It is hot and muggy here, as I said, but I was also severely jet lagged, and needed to reset myself. So, I strapped on my running shoes and did a sweaty afternoon lap of the park around the Louvre. Just as city planning isn’t in the fabric of Parisiens, I think running for running’s sake—particularly in high heat and humidity—is not really a Eurpoean past time either. Even on a warm day like this one, the mall back in Washington D.C. would have hundreds of runners doing laps. In Paris, I was all alone, except for one other runner I passed; and I’m pretty sure that guy was American as well. Everyone else was giving the two of us odd looks.
 
And there was another American we encountered, sitting behind us in the bar where my father and law and I watched the train-wreck that was USA vs. Czech Republic. She was from St. Louis, and she was the only other one in the bar yelling in anguish. The French patrons, on the other hand, seemed only mildly interested in the whole game. Quite disappointing, really. But France plays tomorrow evening, and we’ll see how they all react when their team gets three impressive goals scored against them.
 
My father-in-law had even brushed up on his soccer knowledge, just for my sake. He’s a good man, that father-in-law. He and I then grabbed some dinner across from the Opera, where we polished off a bottle of 2000 Joseph Droughin (producer) Bon de Marches (Premier Cru Vineyard) from Beaune (appellation) in Burgundy (larger appellation). Of course, being from the Beaune, it is Pinot Noir. And, as you can imagine, it was lovely.
 
And now I’m going to pass out. I think I’ve been up 48 hours.

06.11.06 | The Friendly Skies 

OK, I’m off. I’m not in France yet, but we’re making progress. I was up late doing some research for the trip, and I had a last minute panic attack about the whereabouts of my passport, but in the end I actually got to the airport in time to watch the end of the first half of Mexico vs. Iran (the score tied at half, I’m sure my Mexican-American friends back in Napa are in fits).
 
There are so many options for activity on an international flight. You can sleep with your neck at a 90 degree side angle.You can have the beef Wellington or the vegetarian lasagna. You can watch an abridged version of “Big Mama’s House” on a four inch by four inch screen. You can even knock back five gin and tonics before the plant gets out of the state of California, as the woman in front of me has done.
 
But me, I’ve been starting at maps of Grand Cru vineyards in Burgundy. I do so not just out of excitement for the trip, but because always need to brush up on my Cote d‘Or geography and organization. Burgundy is, even to a wine-guy like me, a maze of difficult to pronounce plots of dirt, the wine from many of which I will probably never have the opportunity to taste. Last time I checked, a bottle of Domaine Romanee Conti, from a good vintage, runs $1500. That’s per bottle, mind you.
 
I’ll leave a full history and guidebook to Burgundy to those already provided elsewhere on the web, but a few people have suggested that a little primer might be of help as they follow this PLOG. So, I’ll put in my two cents.
 
Of course the French don’t find the Burgundian system of labeling and classifying wines onerous at all. To the contrary, it is the American system that seems so unintuitive. What strikes me is that the French have had such a long head start on us. They’ve been planting and replanting the same vineyards for so many centuries that they know what grape varietals thrive in which regions. It’s so obvious that it is sometimes illegal to grow any other type of grape in a given spot. Everyone know that Pinot Noir is the only red grape to grow around the village of Morey, so why waste space putting the varietal on the bottle? So, a wine is named for the place from which it is grown.
 
Moreover, the French (and Americans) sometimes refer to Pinot Noir as the “transparent” grape, meaning that in the finished wine the grape tends to step aside and let the flavors and signature of the earth show through. Thus, wines from the greater burgundy region are not nearly as special as wines from a specific village. “Village” wines are not nearly as special as those coming from a specific vineyard. You just have to deal with the fact that some of the vineyards have the same names as the villages in which they reside.
 
But it is not as much the naming system as the classification system that gives American winefolks pause. See, the French not only know which vineyards yield the best fruit, but they have officially classified the vineyards. The best-ranked sites get the designation of Premier Cru. The best of the best (perhaps 30 vineyards?) get labeled as Grand Cru. It is a map of those vineyards that sits in my lap.
 
And Napolean himself added yet another layer of complexity with the institution of his laws of inheritance, some of which are still in place today. They stated that upon the passing of the owner of a vineyard, the land must be split equally amongst his heirs. Thus most all the vineyards, Grand Cru in particular, which were once in the hands of one owner, have been divided and divided as the generations have passed. These vineyards were not very big to begin with. The most severe of these examples is Clos de Vougeot, with more than 75 owners. In the most drastic of cases, a vineyard might be divided down with no more than a few rows per owner.
 
Keep in mind that the Burgundy classification system applies to the vineyards, not the producers. It is standard for a winery in Burgundy to own few, if any, vineyards, but yet they will purchase fruit from numerous vineyards throughout the region. Add to this the fact that the divided vineyards make multiple small quantities from each vineyard available, and it can result in a dizzying array of wines—Village, Premier Cru blends, Premier Cru single vineyards, Grand Cru single vineyards—from each producer.
 
Plus, the whole thing is in French.
 
Maddening, you think? Glorious, I think. It is, like wine itself, a fascinating interaction of agriculture, flavor, politics, history, and culture. How in the world do you figure out is great? Simple: take the consistently best producers, and the best vineyards, and the mix is magical.
 
Some think the American system for labeling will someday “grow up” to match the French system or something similar. I think not. Although certainly we Americans are learning what grows best where, I think we’ll stop shy of a classification system. There is something so traditional, so beautifully steeped in history, so stubborn, so aristocratic, and well, so French about the whole Burgundian classification system. But the American system is different: born out of technological advances, pioneering, full of freedom, entrepreneurial and yes, cocky. In France, you can be born into 300 years of history and fame. In American, you make your own fortune and fame (and your kids are sure to blow it within 30 years after your passing).
 
I’ve got my journey through the Grand Cru’s all figured out. I can’t wait.
 
But first I have to land in Paris, find the rental car, drive myself to my hotel, all the while suffering from 9 hours of jetlag. I have one advantage, however, in that my father in law will be waiting for me down the road from my hotel when I get there. Although he lives and Southern California, he works for a French company, and comes to France for meetings. I’m unclear if he had the meeting schedule and is sticking around to meet me, or if he scheduled the meeting so we could kick around Paris. Regardless, it’s great to have him there. He’s not only family, but a good friend. He’s supposed to have a place all picked out for us to watch USA trounce the Czech Republic.
The game should be interesting, not only because the Czech Republic is pretty darn good, and not only because I'm eager to see if the French hate Americans enough to root for the Czechs, but also because my father-in-law is all about baseball. I'll be curious to see what he thinks of a sport where you can't use your hands.

06.04.06 | Dreaming of Burgundy 

After a long hiatus (has it really been since February?), I’m back.
 
But, I’M HEADED TO BURGUNDY in a week or so, and my plan—I said, “plan”—is to do a little documenting of my trip in the PLOG. Or, at least shortly after I get back. I even bought a new digital SLR for the occasion, I figure I better warm up the literary arm to pitch a good PLOG here next week.
 
The rain has finally ended (ended a month ago, in fact), and the vines are going nuts with all this ground water and nothing but sunny skies overhead. Shoots are all the way to the top wires and then some, with the berries about 50% in bloom. It was an early bud break in a few places, but then we had the cool and the wet, just like last year. We even had a quick frost (I know a few individual vineyards that got fried down to 50% crop when it hit 31 degrees). But the difference between this year and this year is that previously we actually had warm and sunny weather in March, THEN the rains hit again. This year it was just constant cool and wet. It’s a plus, really, as my vines never got out there far enough to get torched by the frost, nor have they had the chance to really develop mildew and botrytis in the leaves the way we worried about it last year. Although, certainly the worry is still there…
 
(In case you are wondering what this pic at right as to do with anything, I needed to practice uploading my pics to the site, and I didn't have anything else handy. Plus, I figure I'll barrage you with some vineyard and winery shots in the next few weeks, so why not get a boy and his blanket for now?)
 
With how the 2005 turned out, however, I’m confident in the 2006 thus far. All that cool weather worked in our favor last year. Let’s just keep our fingers crossed for yet another even growing season and stellar, cool harvest. So far, cluster counts are down, so it looks to be a small harvest as well, which the banks hate but the palates love.
 
Speaking of 2005, they are sitting pretty in the cellar right now. Trying to evaluate unfinished wines with one taste is like determining if you like a city based on one day’s weather. It takes months, tasting each week, to get the overview of the vintage. And, now that I’ve had six months of tasting, I’m grinning. I argue over which lots I like better—Stanley, Suscol, or Nord—which is a good sign. They all have their signatures. Together, I think they will be stunning.
 
One of the particular things that strikes me in the cellar is the significant differences between barrels that supposedly hold the exact same lot of wine. I use a mixture of oak: Tokaj oak from a cooperage called Budapesti Kadar in Hungary, a “cooper’s blend” (different forests) of French oak from a cooper called Demptos, and this year I started using a new barrel from a cooper in Burgundy called Mercurey. They all have such distinctly different flavors.
 
Which leads me to my French trip. Although a good pilgrimage to the epicenter of Pinot Noir is reason enough for an adventure to Burgundy, I am focusing this particular trip on a specific subject: cooperages (barrel producers). I’ve always been a firm believer that oak has a huge impact on the finished wines, and that impact is not properly understood or respected. We wine folks spend a lot of time talking about the terroir of vineyards, when arguably and logically there is just as strong of a terroir to forests. Mercurey is a small cooperage, tiny really, but it is owned by the same man that owns one of the few stave mills that supply many different cooperages in France. What this means, in winery terms, is that the oak is “estate.” The owner, Nicolas, actually follows the wood from tree to stave mill, and from stave mill to his cooperage. If all goes as planned, I am going to visit all these different stages, working my way backwards from tasting numerous Burgundy ’05 reds in Mercurey barrels at various producers, to visiting the cooperage itself for a tour, and culiminating in a walk with Nicolas himself in the forest just outside of Champagne. I’m super excited.
 
I’m also excited to watch World Cup in some French bistro surrounded by some rabid European futbol fans.
 
Stay tuned. 

02.13.06 | Episode IV: A New Vineyard

Let's see, so much to catch up on. I've been waiting to post until we got the new website up and running, but it's taking a bit longer than I expected ...

For starters, I heard that they've got budbreak in some of the higher-elevation vineyards that are closer to the ocean. Good lord that's early. But, we've had some seriously beautiful weather out here. (Sorry, New York, but the jet stream is in our favor right now.) We're expecting colder and wetter weather shortly, so I think my vineyards will stay closed up for a good bit longer, but it is startling to think of the growing season starting in early February for some of these folks. If you want to know what early budbreak does to a growing season and to a winecrafter's stress level, see last's year's PLOG.

I just inked the contract on the new vineyard for the 2006 harvest. Poseidon's Vineyard sits adjacent to the Napa Marina in Carneros. You can literally see the boats bobbing up and down just a few feet away. It's a drastic vineyard, with "flats" that are good for nothing more than sparkling clones. But, there is also a hillside that was formerly (in geological terms) the bank of the Carneros Creek. Filled with gravel, the hillside used to also be planted to sparkling clones, until the owners of the vineyard realized that the sparkling producer who was purchasing the fruit was using that particular hillside block for a color blender in their master blend. Any hillside that gives good color to sparkling wine clones is a serious contender for still wine. They replanted the vineyard to Dijon clones (the groovy still-wine clones), and I've had the resulting Pinot Noir. Stunning. They are giving me six rows on the slope. I feel honored and blessed.

The Molnars own this vineyard. They also own the Budapesti Kadar cooperage in Hungary, from which I get some of my Tokaj-oak barrels. Peter Molnar manages the property. He's also a hell of a tele-skier; I know, because we just went up to Tahoe for two days of work and ski. Gotta admit we got in more of the latter. As I've stated before, I think soulful farmers produce soulful fruit. This is a perfect test case. We agreed to one year of fruit, and we'll see how it goes after that. I'm hoping to expand production by 100 cases or so.

I also got in a couple days of skiing at the Wine and Ski Classic in Park City, UT, two weekends ago. What great slopes out there, and even greater wine folks (despite some unique alcohol-distribution laws in the state). If you happen to hit the area, check out three restaurants in particular: Blind Dog, 350 Main, and Hapa Grill. All great Truck supporters.

As for the wine, the barrels of 2005 are going through their totally funky stage. This happens every year about this time, but I never get over it. I go in and taste through all the barrels and throw up my hands and declare that I don't know what in the hell is going on. But, things always iron themselves out. Moreover, I've tasted some Pinots all over the valley, and they all seem to go through the same funk. When the wines are just finishing ML and are still on the lees (sediments), all kinds of aromatics come off. You just have to trust that your beautiful fruit, beautiful fermentations, beautiful color, and beautiful history are going to bring this through to be beautiful wine. To quote John Konsgaard, it is the "death" part of the "death and resurrection" in winemaking.

The 2004, however, is grin-inducing indeed. The release is coming up in three weeks or so, and I can't wait. Not only am I tired of telling people I have no wine to share with them (I've been sold out of the 2003 for four months), but I can't wait for folks to taste this new release. It's cleaner and brighter than previous releases, but it's got this wonderful, sweet, floral, toasty and fruit-filled aromatic, and an incredibly juicy mid-pallet. I'm working on the mailer/offering right now. Moreover, we're going to have groovy online ordering available, if we ever get the new website finished.

On other notes, we took Molly Brown, our foster dog from the Katrina disaster, back to the shelter to be adopted out. We'd had her for three months and through the holidays, and it was hard to part with her (tear). The shelter has a couple more local T.V. slots for "marketing" some of the Katrina dogs, and they wanted to get her back to the shelter so she could be available if people came in (she might even make the TV slot itself!) We were also starting to think that the parting would be even more difficult for her if we kept her any longer. We'd performed our duty: she is now through the worst of the heartworm treatment (the reason she wasn't put up for adoption in the first place), and seems recovered from the hurricane and rescue trauma. I actually got an email this morning from the shelter saying that a single, female minister from Marin was interested in adopting Molly Brown and had put a "hold" on her for 24 hours while she thought about it. We'll keep our fingers crossed for that potential blessed event. It breaks my heart to think of Molly Brown sitting in a pen at the shelter for one minute longer than she has to.

Owen turned one last week. We had a most enjoyable John Deere-themed party. I'll include a pic. One of the absolute best joys in life has to be watching your child's first interaction with frosting. The one unfortunate part of the passing of one year is that we're sneaking up on the date that I vowed to run a marathon with Owen. Well, running it with him is now out: turns out the course won't allow strollers due to liability, and I'm not sure my wife is all that excited about the concept. (To tell the truth, I'm not sure Owen is excited about four hours of stroller time either.) And, the final nail in the coffin for the Napa Marathon in particular is that it happens to coincide with my father-in-law's sixtieth birthday. We're going to be out of town. But, we've been training, so I'm still looking for a race. (Any suggestions?) I haven't given up the quest.

Finally, I'll close with a pic of Owen with his great-grandmother Mary. Mary is the original owner of the Green Truck. We traveled back to Kansas at Christmas to visit all the family back there, and this was one of the highlights. Mary's story is elsewhere on this website, but suffice to say that she's had a most fantastic Midwestern life. The trip back to Kansas was good for me, too. Made me remember why I love farming in the first place, made me remember the wonderful friendliness of the Midwest, gave me glimpses of that unending flat horizon of Kansas that I grew up with, and refamiliarized me with a "red state." If I could somehow mix Kansas friendliness, family, and home costs with California vineyards, weather, and fun ...

January 2006

01.02.06 | It rained a bit last night

"I think it rained a bit last night." That was the gross understatement I uttered to my wife on Saturday morning regarding the storm we had last Friday night here in Napa.

I blame such lack of awareness solely and squarely on our new replacement windows. With our old windows, we used to live through storms. The old slider windows rattled in the wind. Actually, if the rain came from just the right angle, the water would find its way between the sliders and enter the room, just above my head, in a fine mist. I can remember a few nights of actually wearing a stocking cap to try and dull the effects of such a mini-storm so that I could sleep.

Friday night, I heard nothing; I slept blissfully. No rattles, no mist, no stocking cap; thus my casual "it rained a bit" comment in the morning. My family and I enjoyed a typical Saturday in Napa. I even made waffles. Then my wife went on a diaper run.

"Napa is FLOODED," my wife said from her cell phone, as she drove over the only open road that connected the east and west sides of Napa.

I decided to survey the situation on foot. She'd reported that traffic was snarled, and besides, I needed a good run to work off some holiday cookies. Moreover, the weather had cleared, the sun was shining, and it was really quite beautiful. In winter, the Napa hillsides are green, and just after a storm there is a wonderful freshness to everything.

I didn't make it six blocks until I saw the first sign: water bubbling up through a manhole cover. Another block closer to the river, and I saw the first of many stunning sights to behold that morning: a small pond swallowing the street and the basements of a dozen or so homes.

I snaked my way along the edge of the river and the flood, working my way towards downtown. Although the new "neighborhood" ponds kept me from getting too close to the river, I could catch glimpses down the streets. The river was, truly, over its banks.

Most of the year, the Napa River is not a very lively river. In fact, it is quite easy to forget that it is there at all. It is not that pretty, holds a great deal of mud, has deep and wide banks, the river itself is usually only about twenty yards wide, and it actually flows backwards for part of the day, as it is affected by the tides.

That tidal aspect to the river was the icing on the cake in this past weekend. High tide was at 1pm on Saturday, precisely when the runoff from the Napa watershed was peaking, and precisely when I was on my run. The river had filled its banks, was a hundred yards wide, was raging by, filled with debris, and—as even CNN reported—had overrun a good chunk of downtown.

The sunshine made it all the more stunning. Here was a beautiful Napa day—the first one in a week, at that—and people were eager to get out, to take their dogs for a walk, to get some exercise. There we all were, on the First Street Bridge, camcorders and picture phones in hand, looking at a solid four square miles of downtown that were underwater.

The railroad tracks and the bottom half of the wine train cars had disappeared below the surface of the water. The river now rushed through the movie theater, four feet above the bottom of the doors. The windshield of a lone car poked up in what was previously a parking lot for downtown. It was hard to tell where the river was supposed to be going, as it seemed to be going where it damn well pleased.

( I found these incredible photos online .)

They say a thousand homes got hit, as well as a couple dozen businesses downtown. Devastating as it was, I kept thinking of Katrina and the scope of that disaster. Not that such a comparison is any consolation to those Napkins who, on Sunday, had to shovel mud, debris, ruined couches, and broken refrigerators out of their lower floors. It is also not much consolation to those businesses that missed out on New Year's Eve, which is typically a financial slam-dunk for restaurants around here. Even for those establishments that were not underwater, most of the main roads around Napa were closed, so neither customers nor employees could get to the dining room.

Many have called to ask about me and to inquire about the impact on the vineyards. My answer to the former is that my house is on higher ground, and luckily my family and my wine are unharmed. The answer to the latter is that I don't think, at this stage, the vines really care about all this water.

I sat through a similar deluge when El Nino hit Chalone in 1997. I spent four glorious days cut off from the rest of the world when the only road washed out. It's not a bad place to be stranded: a winery with a generator and a really big cellar. I'll add that that little flood actually led to me meeting my wife, as she—a park ranger—was later stationed at the entrance to the National Park next door to keep people out, and I was determined to get in. As for the vines, even those that were under water for days, they slept through the entire affair and awoke the following spring none the wiser. I expect the same will go for Napa.

So, the Napa flood is a disaster, and a shocking one to see at that. But hopefully it is limited in its scope. Napa has experience with this: the river flooded last in 1986, and much more frequently before that. I suspect the town and people will bounce back quite quickly. There's a huge flood-control project underway downtown that is about halfway finished. Apparently, some of that progress helped control things this time around (although I've heard a few citizens complain that it moved the flood into areas that previously didn't flood).

On other notes—wine related notes—the caves are high above any flooding. Although the few fissures in the cave walls that leak during typical winter rains are dripping with a bit more frequency, overall the barrels are completely unaware of the inclement weather. The 2005 Pinot has officially been "put to bed." I confirmed malo-lactic was finished and protected both lots with sulfur just days before heading back to Kansas for Christmas. Another month, when the wines adjust to the sulfur, and we'll start getting a bead on just how great this vintage is.

As for our trip to Kansas, I'll save that for another plog. It was quite fun to expose our son Owen to the roots of his family. He even met his great-grandmother, original owner of the truck itself.

Release News

Current Release: 2007
Status: Sold Out.

Direct Buying Window: Closed; next release 3/11/10

Upon release in Spring, Road 31
Pinot Noir is first offered to the
“truckers” (mail list).

Accolades

"Each of the past three years, Fortner and his green 1966 Ford pickup have turned out a tiny batch—500 to 700 cases—of Pinot Noir that has garnered accolades and a mailing list of rabid fans, endearingly called “truckers.” His one-man operation is the epitome of specialty small-batch winemaking.” –Men’s Journal, “Napa’s New Breed,"
–October, 2007

 

"This wine walks the walk (or should I say rides the road). The pretty ruby color draws you in. The sexy nose offers up dark cherries, roses, nutmeg, and toasty oak. Flavors of cherries, cinnamon and vanilla are luscious enough to nibble on. The wine finishes with a sexy candied cherry kiss that lingers. A beautifully balanced wine with sensual creaminess that only Pinot Noir can offer. Pinot Noir All-American 2006"
–PinotFile Newsletter, Dec, 2006


"One man show Kent Fortner has, in a few short years, established a loyal and thirsty following for his rare Napa Valley Pinot Noir. Sourced from the Nord and Suscol Ridge Vineyards—the southernmost and coolest in the Napa appellation (even south of Carneros!)—[the wine] gives a clear voice to what Kent refers to as ‘the prettier side’ of Pinot Noir. And, yes there really is a Green Truck..."
–Walley’s Wine New, June 2005


>> More

Business Office
Phone: 707-649-1200

Email

Address (My home; correspondence only please)
1175 Azuar Dr.
Mare Island, CA 94592

The caves and winery in the Stag’s Leap district of Napa are open strictly—but happily—by appointment; just contact me at the above.